In a recent hearing in Redwood City, California, Dr. Dharmesh Patel was accused of driving his Tesla off a cliff with his family inside, claiming he was suffering from major depressive disorder and experiencing a psychotic break. Two doctors testified that Patel was hallucinating, hearing footsteps, and believed his children were involved in sex trafficking due to fears related to the fentanyl crisis and the war in Ukraine. Patel had requested a mental health diversion in his case, which would involve a two-year treatment plan instead of jail time.
If Patel’s request for a mental health diversion is granted, his charges would be dropped if he does not commit any crimes during the proposed treatment plan. A Stanford psychiatric clinician would oversee Patel’s treatment, which would include extensive outpatient care, group and individual therapy sessions, and meetings with a psychotherapist. The doctors involved in Patel’s case believe he is a good candidate for the program due to his low risk of injuring others and his motivation and progress with treatment since the crash.
After a series of 18 tests and conversations with Patel and his siblings, psychologist Mark Patterson diagnosed Patel with major depressive disorder. Patel was charged with three counts of attempted murder for the crash on January 2, 2023, where he drove his family’s car off a cliff and survived with his wife and two young children. While Patel claimed the crash was due to tire issues with the Tesla, his wife told investigators that he was suicidal and purposefully drove off the road.
Prosecutors have argued against the diversion program for Patel, claiming he has been diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder instead of major depressive disorder. They have raised concerns about monitoring Patel if he were to leave the court, citing the difficulty in ensuring he continues his medication without the oversight of probation or parole. Despite the arguments against diversion, Patel remains in custody without bail at San Mateo County Jail.
Overall, Patel’s case raises significant questions about mental health, treatment, and legal responsibility in cases involving severe mental illnesses. The possibility of a mental health diversion program offers a potential alternative to jail time for individuals struggling with mental health issues, recognizing the importance of treatment and rehabilitation in addressing underlying issues. As Patel’s case continues to unfold, it will be essential to consider the complexities of mental health diagnoses and the potential impact of diversion programs on individuals facing criminal charges.
