The debate surrounding Gaza has become inflamed and divisive, particularly for those identifying as Jewish or Muslim. The focus on lecturing and berating rather than listening and understanding has contributed to the tension. Many individuals, especially university students, lack the skills to engage in respectful debate and manage conflict effectively. Jewish students and staff have reported feeling threatened due to the harsh rhetoric directed towards them, despite the fact that the real brutality is occurring in Gaza, where thousands have died and essential services have been destroyed.
Despite the challenges faced by students, particularly those in lower socio-economic groups or from migrant backgrounds, there has been a recent surge of activism at universities. At RMIT University in Melbourne, students have set up tents on campus to protest and engage in discussions about the situation in Gaza. This renewed focus on activism is a welcome change, as student protests have a history of influencing policy and societal change. However, the lack of protests on other issues, such as the conflict in Ukraine, raises questions about the motivations behind student activism and the effectiveness of protests.
Historically, student protests in Australia have followed the patterns seen in the United States, with a focus on wars, racial discrimination, and environmental issues. While protests can be effective in bringing attention to important causes, the ultimate impact of these actions can vary. The demands of the RMIT students, such as calling for the closure of the Sir Lawrence Wackett Centre due to its partnerships with military contractors, highlight the complexity of navigating the intersection of academia, politics, and activism. It remains to be seen how these protests will evolve and whether they will lead to tangible change.
As a journalism professor, the author emphasizes the importance of engaging in open dialogue and thoughtful discussions about complex issues like the situation in Gaza. By listening to diverse perspectives and challenging preconceived notions, students can develop a more nuanced understanding of global conflicts and the role they play in shaping them. The author also encourages students to consider the impact of their actions and demands on university policies and practices, urging them to find a balance between passion and pragmatism in their activism.
In conclusion, the current wave of student activism at universities like RMIT reflects a growing desire among young people to engage with pressing global issues and advocate for change. By participating in protests, discussions, and debates, students have the opportunity to influence policy decisions and shape public opinion. However, it is important for students to approach activism with a critical mindset, considering the long-term implications of their actions and the potential consequences for their communities and society as a whole. As the author notes, finding a balance between passion and pragmatism is essential for creating sustainable and effective social change.
