Recent efforts to reform institutions have led to internal dissent and external pressures that threaten to distort or undermine core missions. Nonprofit organizations, governmental agencies, university departments, and cultural institutions have faced turmoil in the pursuit of progressive political goals. The rush to apply sweeping standards has risked politicization, mission drift, irrelevance, and dissolution. The conflict in Gaza has now reached American universities, with organizations such as PEN America facing criticism and boycotts.
PEN America, a nonprofit organization dedicated to free expression by journalists and authors, has been targeted by a boycott campaign led by some members. In response to accusations of “implicit support of the Israeli occupation” and “aiding and abetting genocide,” PEN canceled its annual World Voices Festival and literary awards ceremony. While some writers refuse to have their work considered, the organization has maintained its independence and commitment to free expression by accommodating diverse viewpoints.
Critics argue that PEN America has not adequately advocated for Palestinian writers compared to Ukrainian writers, leading to internal dissent within the organization. However, PEN has emphasized the importance of remaining inclusive of differing opinions and perspectives, even in the face of criticism. While legitimate grievances may exist regarding advocacy for writers in conflict zones, the organization strives to protect freedom of expression for all members regardless of geopolitical circumstances.
As a member of PEN America, the author acknowledges the organization’s role in protecting journalists, fighting censorship, and advocating against online abuse and book bans. Despite personal views on political issues, the author appreciates the diversity of opinions within the organization and the protection it offers to members with differing perspectives. Instances of dissent within PEN, such as the honoring of Charlie Hebdo in 2015 and the appointment of a transgender writer as president, highlight the organization’s commitment to free expression.
The author emphasizes the importance of standing by organizations like PEN America that uphold principles of free expression, even in the face of political pressure and internal dissent. The organization’s charter underscores its commitment to opposing suppression of freedom of expression on a global scale, making it essential to support its mission and all members who share its values. Despite challenges and criticism, preserving independent organizations like PEN is crucial in safeguarding the principles of free speech and thoughtful dialogue in society.
