Arizona Senate President Warren Peterson has criticized Gov. Katie Hobbs for not taking action to secure the border, leading to the approval of the “Secure Border Act” in a Senate committee. Modeled after Texas’ SB 4, the bill would criminalize illegal border crossings and grant local law enforcement the authority to enforce immigration laws. Peterson highlighted the bill’s focus on border security, addressing the fentanyl crisis, and ensuring government benefits are received by legal residents. He emphasized that the bill is different from the controversial SB 1070 law, as it is narrowly focused on securing the border.
By putting the “Secure Border Act” before voters, Arizona Republicans aim to bypass Gov. Hobbs, who previously vetoed a similar bill in March. Hobbs has expressed opposition to the new effort, calling it harmful for businesses and communities in the state. Additionally, she criticized the bill for not providing a solution to the border crisis. Peterson defended the legislation as a necessary step to address the issue, citing the governor’s veto of 10 previous border security bills. He believes that letting voters decide on the issue in November is the best course of action, considering their concerns about the border.
The “Secure Border Act” is expected to move to the full Senate for approval and then to the House of Representatives, where it has the support of Republican Speaker Ben Toma. Peterson expressed confidence that the bill will be well-received by voters, as border security is a top concern for many constituents. Additionally, the bill aims to work around Gov. Hobbs’ opposition and provide a legislative solution to the ongoing border crisis. The governor’s office has not responded to requests for comment on the matter, highlighting the political divide on the issue within the state.
The bill has also faced criticism for being similar to Texas’ SB 4, which is currently the subject of a court battle. Critics argue that granting local law enforcement authority over immigration enforcement could lead to racial profiling and violations of civil rights. Despite these concerns, the bill’s supporters believe that it is a necessary step to address the increasing number of illegal border crossings, particularly in Arizona and California. By seeking voter approval, Arizona Republicans hope to implement stricter immigration laws and work around Gov. Hobbs’ opposition to such measures.
Ultimately, the political tug-of-war over the “Secure Border Act” reflects the broader debate on immigration policy in Arizona. Gov. Hobbs and Republican lawmakers have conflicting views on how to address border security, with each side advocating for different approaches. As the bill moves through the legislative process and towards a potential voter referendum in November, the future of immigration policy in Arizona remains uncertain. The outcome will likely have significant implications for the state’s approach to border security and enforcement of immigration laws.
