Alina Habba, lawyer for former President Donald Trump, criticized the U.S. justice system, specifically accusing judges presiding over the cases against her client of unfair treatment. She expressed her concerns about the treatment Trump and his defense team have received in court, particularly following an incident where another attorney for Trump was chastised by a judge during his criminal hush-money trial in New York. Trump, facing multiple felony charges related to falsifying business records in a payment to Stormy Daniels, has pleaded not guilty and claimed the charges were politically motivated.
Habba voiced her opposition to the treatment of Trump’s attorneys by judges, citing instances where she felt they were dismissive and unwilling to consider facts or evidence. She mentioned facing public scrutiny while representing Trump in previous cases, including being scolded by a judge during court sessions. While Habba believes Trump’s lawyers are unfairly targeted, opposing counsel has criticized her behavior in court, stating that she acted less like a lawyer when representing her client. Legal experts have also commented on Habba’s defense of Trump during his defamation lawsuit, with some blaming her for his defeat in court.
Habba denounced the gag order placed on Trump as “disgusting” and unconstitutional, criticizing the judges presiding over his legal battles for their behavior. She claimed that judges intentionally berate and ridicule attorneys, playing into the presence of the press in the courtroom. Habba expressed her belief that this mistreatment is intentional and aimed at undermining the credibility of Trump’s legal team. She also accused the media of running with this narrative and portraying the attorneys as incompetent.
The lawyer’s comments reflect a broader critique of the U.S. justice system, with concerns about biased treatment of high-profile clients and their legal representatives. Habba’s views highlight the challenges faced by attorneys defending clients involved in politically sensitive cases, where public scrutiny and media coverage can influence the outcome. The ongoing legal battles involving Trump have raised questions about the fairness and impartiality of the judicial process, particularly in cases with significant political implications. The debate surrounding Trump’s legal troubles underscores the complexities of balancing the principles of due process and accountability in high-profile cases.
